Building capacity for change

As I found myself immersed in the process of this blog, I didn’t realize how deep, vast and powerful this one word “change” would be, nor how many layers it could contain. I find myself in the spring season where I live. The frozen landscape is slowly thawing, both flora and fauna are starting to move and break through the ice crust that had been cherished as insulation against the cold of winter.  So what is it that pushes all this life to come back? Is it food? Daylight? Temperature? Can we agree that multiple factors are known to entice this change of rhythm. So then how do larger ecosystems change? Unless a catastrophic environmental disaster strikes and forces change on a larger magnitude, change usually happens slowly and builds gradually. We can see this in Primary and Secondary regeneration of forest ecosystems.  We can see this in the slow ecological transformation of diversity and habitat quality through predator-prey dynamics or in the introduction of invasive species. A great example of these ecosystem changes is Dan Egan's book: The Death and Life of the Great Lakes.

I’m using this analogy to nature and wildlife because I’ve been reflecting on the nuances and variances of individual responses to change. Looking at nature always provides me with answers, and I have so many questions to ponder on this topic of change. Multiple events occurred lately and stimulated insights for me, coinciding with the New Moon in Aries, which is the first sign of the zodiac wheel, symbolizing new beginnings and endeavors. The sister willows that I cherished and have depicted on my website for every season have been cut down. I was out for a walk to visit them after a long and cold winter and was confronted with a big hole in the landscape view. I’ve added a picture to show the contrast and emptiness a tree removal leaves, especially in open landscapes. Perhaps in a forest it's not as visually jarring because of the closeness of life all around. But this coincided with the writing of my blog on change. It was a visible change in the ecosystem that saddened me. Yet the symbolism pointed to a time for change again. For change as part of life, as the cyclical rhythm that governs life. These sister willows have inspired my path, but now it was time to pass the torch.

><)))’> What is our first response to change? <’(((><

For starters, let's acknowledge that some of us simply don’t like change while some of us are on a spectrum of being just okay to very comfortable with it, to absolutely needing it.  This can also vary throughout phases of life. It occurred to me, through insight from dance, that in being able to just change direction, there needs to be a certain level of stability, of groundedness. In continuing with the dance analogy, a “ball change” allows for a quick and sharp transition to another move or foot position.  It is a set-up position to allow for the next dance move. It's a grounding that anchors an opening. This opening, whether it's a change in direction or a full spin for example, can only happen through a stable foundation. So to come back from the analogy and bring it in the context of our everyday life, this can mean having a secure house; a safe relationship; a financial cushion, supportive friendships, etc, etc.

So I ask the following question: What is valued so deeply that it could anchor a stable progress and allow an opening to something new?

A second question would be: How could this value slow down the change process if it is no longer valid?

><)))’> How do we approach change? <’(((><

Do we tend to resist change or embrace it? Just acknowledging this can bring us so much insight. If we resist, then what is at the root of this resistance? What is needed to establish a stable foundation first? If we embrace change, are we steadfast? Or perhaps a bit reckless? 

Does the manner in how we approach change affect our overall view of what change means for us? None of these questions are meant to be a black or white answer. It is about noticing where on the spectrum we fall. It is about awareness. Because from knowing where we stand in this present moment, we can slowly start to explore and take steps forward. But knowing whether we’re standing on concrete or sitting in a tree branch for example, will illuminate the next step that would be needed. These steps will vary for each and everyone of us.  

Do we want to and can we just jump off the branch or do we need to slowly climb down? What are the factors involved?

If we’re standing on concrete, what’s surrounding the concrete? Is it an easy step forward or do we have injuries that could slow us down or even prevent us? What does our present scenario look like today?

><)))’> Where is change coming from? <’(((><

Is the drive for change inward or outward? How does this affect our response and our approach? Are we taking a pause to truly be with what is wanting to shift and how our body is responding?

As I kept coming back to this blog, I realized that “building capacity” for change is only the surface of a deeper inner change. When we build capacity, we are opening a door and inviting new perspectives. A wider lens perhaps.  As much as change may, at times, appear sudden, change is really gradual.  It's a building that has been happening, sometimes unseen, below the surface.  This building of a sturdy ground, or a safety net, eventually becomes the launching pad from which we can symbolically push off.  From this launching pad, we are moving. This movement can be forward or in a new direction or even a u-turn. The direction in this specific context is not important. What’s more important is the recognition of movement in itself.

I recognized that having a capacity for change comes from being open to diversity and possibilities. This ultimately comes from learning how to move. So sometimes, maybe we just need to move our bodies in different ways to allow for that change of routine. This might be a different activity, a new sport, dancing, yoga, etc, etc. Movement can shift and open new avenues that have become clogged or stuck.

><)))’> From fear, to curiosity, to creativity <’(((><

I’ve noticed my own tendency to view things through a spectrum when trying to assimilate and embody knowledge.  In this context of change, the spectrum goes from fear on one side, to varying levels of curiosity, to creativity and adventure. While creativity and adventure fall on the same end of the spectrum, perhaps they are applicable in different contexts. Can leaning into curiosity reduce some of our fear? And can curiosity and wider exploration open us up to deeper creativity in our everyday lives? Ultimately, are these not all various forms of movement?

Astrology is a symbolic language that helps me conceptualize things.  When I observe the stable, sturdy fixed signs (Taurus, Leo, Scorpio, Aquarius) that naturally precede the mutable signs (Gemini, Virgo, Sagittarius, Pisces) which invite movement and change, it becomes so clear to me.  As symbolically represented in the zodiac wheel, the capacity to change has been harnessed in the fixed sign first. It's that safe space, or home or even just a bedroom to which you can always return to.  It's where your guard can come down and your nervous system can breathe, no matter how far you venture out into new territory. The fixity of a sign shows up as the steadiness, the groundedness, the preservation, but also the resistance to change and stagnation.  Where, then, is that nuanced space between the fixed and the mutable? How do we bring awareness to this duality? 

As I’m coming full circle on these reflections, the word safety arises. The safety of our own space, the safety within our own bodies. So if we added more nuance to this spectrum by pairing Fear and Safety on one end and Creativity and Adventure on the other, what does that look like for you?

Perhaps, the quality of our inner safety directly reflects our openness to change?